http://messymissy.net/technology/em01b-websensor-revisited Yet another attempt at sanity Thu, 07 Jul 2011 04:29:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://messymissy.net/technology/em01b-websensor-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-1642 Missy Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:54:22 +0000 http://messymissy.net/misc/em01b-websensor-revisited#comment-1642 @rob I did indeed contact support. I'm having the same problems with the second unit that I was with the first. It is being attributed to broadcast traffic on our network. I'm going to try Bryan's suggestion and see if that improves performance at all. @rob
I did indeed contact support. I’m having the same problems with the second unit that I was with the first. It is being attributed to broadcast traffic on our network. I’m going to try Bryan‘s suggestion and see if that improves performance at all.

]]> http://messymissy.net/technology/em01b-websensor-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-1641 Missy Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:52:58 +0000 http://messymissy.net/misc/em01b-websensor-revisited#comment-1641 I haven't tried that yet, no. That would eliminate the broadcast traffic. Perhaps that will work. I'll try it and let you all know how it works... Now to find a half height network card. :) I haven’t tried that yet, no. That would eliminate the broadcast traffic. Perhaps that will work. I’ll try it and let you all know how it works… Now to find a half height network card.

]]> http://messymissy.net/technology/em01b-websensor-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-1639 rob Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:20:04 +0000 http://messymissy.net/misc/em01b-websensor-revisited#comment-1639 Oh no, this is disappointing. I was considering picking one up. Have you contacted their support for an RMA? Oh no, this is disappointing. I was considering picking one up. Have you contacted their support for an RMA?

]]> http://messymissy.net/technology/em01b-websensor-revisited/comment-page-1#comment-1636 Bryan Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:21:31 +0000 http://messymissy.net/misc/em01b-websensor-revisited#comment-1636 Have you tried sticking a cheap-o little switch onto a secondary nic of your nagios box and plugging the sensor into that? 192.168.x.x should be fine. Either that or a cross over cable. That should at least take network traffic and broadcasts out of the equation for troubleshooting purposes. Have you tried sticking a cheap-o little switch onto a secondary nic of your nagios box and plugging the sensor into that? 192.168.x.x should be fine. Either that or a cross over cable. That should at least take network traffic and broadcasts out of the equation for troubleshooting purposes.

]]>